4.4 Article

Comparison of Digital PCR and Quantitative PCR with Various SARS-CoV-2 Primer-Probe Sets

Journal

JOURNAL OF MICROBIOLOGY AND BIOTECHNOLOGY
Volume 31, Issue 3, Pages 358-367

Publisher

KOREAN SOC MICROBIOLOGY & BIOTECHNOLOGY
DOI: 10.4014/jmb.2009.09006

Keywords

COVID-19; SARS-CoV-2; reverse transcription-quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR); droplet digital PCR (ddPCR); nucleocapsid protein gene; envelope protein gene

Funding

  1. National Research Council of Science and Technology grant by the Ministry of Science and ICT [CRC-16-01-KRICT]
  2. Establishment of measurement standards for Chemistry and Radiation [KRISS-2020-GP2020-0003]
  3. Development of Measurement Standards and Technology for Biomaterials and Medical Convergence - Korea Research Institute of Standards and Science [KRISS-2020-GP2020-0004]
  4. National Research Council of Science & Technology (NST), Republic of Korea [C140130] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)
  5. National Research Foundation of Korea [4199990713972] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study found that ddPCR is more sensitive than RT-qPCR in detecting viral RNA, especially for determining the copy number of reference materials.
The World Health Organization ( WHO) has declared the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) as an international health emergency. Current diagnostic tests are based on the reverse transcriptionquantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) method, which is the gold standard test that involves the amplification of viral RNA. However, the RT- qPCR assay has limitations in terms of sensitivity and quantification. In this study, we tested both qPCR and droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) to detect low amounts of viral RNA. The cycle threshold (CT) of the viral RNA by RT-PCR significantly varied according to the sequences of the primer and probe sets with in vitro transcript (IVT) RNA or viral RNA as templates, whereas the copy number of the viral RNA by ddPCR was effectively quantified with IVT RNA, cultured viral RNA, and RNA from clinical samples. Furthermore, the clinical samples were assayed via both methods, and the sensitivity of the ddPCR was determined to be equal to or more than that of the RT-qPCR. However, the ddPCR assay is more suitable for determining the copy number of reference materials. These findings suggest that the qPCR assay with the ddPCR defined reference materials could be used as a highly sensitive and compatible diagnostic method for viral RNA detection.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available