4.7 Article

Direct contact membrane distillation: A sensitivity analysis and an outlook on membrane effective thermal conductivity

Journal

JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE SCIENCE
Volume 624, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2020.119035

Keywords

Direct contact membrane distillation; Numerical model; Key performance indicators; Sensitivity analysis; Membrane effective thermal conductivity

Funding

  1. Institutional Links Newton-Mosharafa Fund [261749278, STIFA-27653]
  2. Research England QR GCRF Institutional Allocation [X/165302]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A rigorous and high-fidelity two-dimensional numerical model for a direct contact membrane distillation (DCMD) module has been developed to investigate the sensitivity of key performance indicators to operational conditions and membrane characteristics. It was shown that more appropriate models are required to accurately estimate certain parameters, leading to the proposal of a new model.
A rigorous and high-fidelity two-dimensional numerical model for a direct contact membrane distillation (DCMD) module has been developed. The developed model incorporates all the key physics governing the transport phenomena taking place within the membrane distillation (MD) module. The spatial variation of the physical properties of the fluids flowing in the channels and the membrane with temperature has been captured. The model has been used to investigate the sensitivity of the key performance indicators or KPIs (i.e. the transmembrane flux, the thermal efficiency and the temperature polarisation coefficient) to ten key operational conditions and membrane characteristics. The models used to estimate the effective thermal conductivity of the membranes have been discussed and it was shown that more appropriate models are required to accurately estimate the latter parameter and, to this end, a new model has been proposed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available