4.7 Article

A rapid and cost-effective multiplex ARMS-PCR method for the simultaneous genotyping of the circulating SARS-CoV-2 phylogenetic clades

Journal

JOURNAL OF MEDICAL VIROLOGY
Volume 93, Issue 5, Pages 2962-2970

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jmv.26818

Keywords

ARMS; clade; COVID-19; multiplex PCR; mutations; SARS-CoV-2

Categories

Funding

  1. Jashore University of Science and Technology Research Grant - University Grant Commission, Bangladesh [FoBST-06]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study introduces a rapid, simple, and cost-effective multiplex PCR assay to identify six phylogenetic clades of SARS-CoV-2, which has been optimized and validated. This multiplex detection method can quickly and inexpensively discriminate the phylogenetic clade variants of infected individuals.
Tracing the globally circulating severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) phylogenetic clades by high-throughput sequencing is costly, time-consuming, and labor-intensive. We here propose a rapid, simple, and cost-effective amplification refractory mutation system (ARMS)-based multiplex reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay to identify six distinct phylogenetic clades: S, L, V, G, GH, and GR. Our multiplex PCR is designed in a mutually exclusive way to identify V-S and G-GH-GR clade variants separately. The pentaplex assay included all five variants and the quadruplex comprised of the triplex variants alongside either V or S clade mutations that created two separate subsets. The procedure was optimized with 0.2-0.6 mu M primer concentration, 56-60 degrees C annealing temperature, and 3-5 ng/mu l complementary DNA to validate on 24 COVID-19-positive samples. Targeted Sanger sequencing further confirmed the presence of the clade-featured mutations with another set of primers. This multiplex ARMS-PCR assay is a fast, low-cost alternative and convenient to discriminate the circulating phylogenetic clades of SARS-CoV-2.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available