4.7 Article

Social Network Analysis of Intensive Care Unit Health Care Professionals Measured by Wearable Sociometric Badges: Longitudinal Observational Study

Journal

JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH
Volume 22, Issue 12, Pages -

Publisher

JMIR PUBLICATIONS, INC
DOI: 10.2196/23184

Keywords

wearable; interprofessional communication; clinician interaction; social network analysis

Funding

  1. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science KAKENHI [JP 18K08916, 19KK0224, 18K08917, 19KK0196, 18H02622, 20K17859, 20K17858]
  2. Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development (AMED) [19217687]
  3. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [20K17858, 20K17859, 19KK0224, 18K08917] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Use of wearable sensor technology for studying human teamwork behavior is expected to generate a better understanding of the interprofessional interactions between health care professionals. Objective: We used wearable sociometric sensor badges to study how intensive care unit (ICU) health care professionals interact and are socially connected. Methods: We studied the face-to-face interaction data of 76 healthcare professionals in the ICU at Mie University Hospital collected over 4 weeks via wearable sensors. Results: We detail the spatiotemporal distributions of staff members' inter- and intraprofessional active face-to-face interactions, thereby generating a comprehensive visualization of who met whom, when, where, and for how long in the ICU. Social network analysis of these active interactions, concomitant with centrality measurements, revealed that nurses constitute the core members of the network, while doctors remain in the periphery. Conclusions: Our social network analysis using the comprehensive ICU interaction data obtained by wearable sensors has revealed the leading roles played by nurses within the professional communication network.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available