4.5 Article

Experimental Study on the Forming Limit of GH605 Superalloy Sheet Using Digital Image Correlation

Journal

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS ENGINEERING AND PERFORMANCE
Volume 30, Issue 2, Pages 1420-1429

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11665-020-05388-3

Keywords

digital image correlation; forming limit test; forming limit diagram; GH605 superalloy; strain evolution

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [11872025]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, the forming limit of the GH605 superalloy was determined using digital image correlation analysis to monitor strain evolution. Material constants were obtained through tensile experiments, and different forming limit test methods were compared to establish a complete forming limit diagram. Factors influencing the forming limit were analyzed, and forming limit diagrams for three types of GH605 superalloys were obtained, showing a typical 'V' shape curve with the minimum forming limit near plane strain.
In this work, the forming limit of GH605 superalloy was determined by using digital image correlation analysis to monitor the strain evolution during this process. First, tensile experiments were conducted to determine the material constants of three different types of GH605 superalloys. Then, the Holmberg and Marciniak methods of forming limit tests were compared, and the complete forming limit diagram was obtained by combining the results from 6 specimens. Finally, the factors affecting the forming limit were analyzed, and the forming limit diagrams (FLD) of three different types of GH605 superalloys were obtained. The results showed that the forming limit curve of GH605 sheet and strip showed a typical 'V' shape, and the minimum forming limit appeared near the plane strain. The FLD of GH605 sheet was also obtained in this work, which is of great significance to numerical simulations of sheet metals and the formulation of process parameters.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available