4.1 Article

20 Years of Single-Incision-Pediatric-Endoscopic-Surgery: A Survey on Opinion and Experience Among International Pediatric Endosurgery Group Members

Journal

Publisher

MARY ANN LIEBERT, INC
DOI: 10.1089/lap.2020.0797

Keywords

SIPES; IPEG; single-site-surgery; single-incision-surgery; pediatric minimally invasive surgery

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

An online survey conducted among International Pediatric Endosurgery Group (IPEG) members revealed that the majority of pediatric surgeons use Single-Incision-Pediatric-Endoscopic-Surgery (SIPES) for lower complexity cases, such as appendectomy, mainly for cosmetic reasons. Despite the better cosmesis, 70% of respondents believe that there is a lack of convincing scientific evidence for the benefits of SIPES. Further studies and discussions on this technique are needed.
Aim/Background: Assessment of current role and future trends of Single-Incision-Pediatric-Endoscopic-Surgery (SIPES) in pediatric surgery among International Pediatric Endosurgery Group (IPEG) members two decades after introduction. Materials and Methods: An online survey was conducted between December 2019 and April 2020 on behalf of the IPEG Research Committee. All IPEG members were contacted by e-mail and asked to complete an anonymous questionnaire that included 39 items on SIPES. Results: One hundred eighty-four practicing pediatric surgeons completed the questionnaire from a pool of 890 IPEG members. The majority (76%) of respondents performed SIPES for more than 6 years with the following caseload per month: 1 case (31%), 2-5 cases (30%), 6-10 cases (24%), and >10 cases (17%). The four most commonly performed procedures were appendectomy (95%), Meckel diverticulectomy (55%), treatment of ovarian pathologies (43%), and U-stitch gastrostomy (40%). Complex reconstructive SIPES procedures were performed rarely. Most surgeons (95%) stated that better cosmesis is the predominant advantage of SIPES procedures. The majority of respondents (70%) felt that there is no convincing scientific evidence that SIPES offers benefits to multi-port minimally invasive procedures. Conclusion: Twenty years after introduction of SIPES, this technique has found its place in pediatric endoscopic surgery. Eighty percent of participating IPEG members of this survey apply SIPES for cases of lower complexity, such as appendectomy mainly for cosmetic reasons. The fact that 70% of respondents state that the scientific evidence for the benefits of SIPES is not convincing suggests that further studies and discussion on this technique are needed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available