4.7 Article

Machine learning integrated design for additive manufacturing

Journal

JOURNAL OF INTELLIGENT MANUFACTURING
Volume 33, Issue 4, Pages 1073-1086

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10845-020-01715-6

Keywords

Additive manufacturing; Design for AM; Machine learning

Funding

  1. Digital Manufacturing and Design (DManD) Research Center at the Singapore University of Technology and Design - Singapore National Research Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper proposes a design for additive manufacturing (AM) framework integrated with machine learning (ML) to learn the complex relationships between design and performance spaces. It demonstrates the effectiveness of using ML in designing a customized ankle brace with tunable mechanical performance.
For improving manufacturing efficiency and minimizing costs, design for additive manufacturing (AM) has been accordingly proposed. The existing design for AM methods are mainly surrogate model based. Due to the increasingly available data nowadays, machine learning (ML) has been applied to medical diagnosis, image processing, prediction, classification, learning association, etc. A variety of studies have also been carried out to use machine learning for optimizing the process parameters of AM with corresponding objectives. In this paper, a ML integrated design for AM framework is proposed, which takes advantage of ML that can learn the complex relationships between the design and performance spaces. Furthermore, the primary advantage of ML over other surrogate modelling methods is the capability to model input-output relationships in both directions. That is, a deep neural network can model property-structure relationships, given structure-property input-output data. A case study was carried out to demonstrate the effectiveness of using ML to design a customized ankle brace that has a tunable mechanical performance with tailored stiffness.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available