4.3 Article

Characterisation of a small volume (1 x 1) CeBr3 crystal for γ-ray measurements up to 4.4 MeV

Journal

JOURNAL OF INSTRUMENTATION
Volume 16, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

IOP Publishing Ltd
DOI: 10.1088/1748-0221/16/01/T01004

Keywords

Gamma detectors (scintillators, CZT, HPGe, HgI etc); Heavy-ion detectors; Scintillators; scintillation and light emission processes (solid, gas and liquid scintillators)

Funding

  1. Department Of Science & Technology (DST), Govt. Of India

Ask authors/readers for more resources

CeBr3 crystal has similar energy and timing resolutions as LaBr3:Ce, but surpasses LaBr3:Ce in terms of internal activity.
This paper reports about complete characterization of a small volume, cylindrical (1 '' x 1 '') CeBr3 crystal. The measurements include determination of energy and timing resolutions, absolute photo-peak detection efficiency, internal activity and linearity of response up to 4.43MeV gamma-ray energy. The results, so obtained, have been compared with the performance of NaI(Tl) and LaBr3:Ce crystals of similar volume. Realistic Monte Carlo simulations were carried out using GEANT4 package to reproduce the experimental spectra and photo-peak detection efficiency. We have obtained best energy resolution of 4.7% at 662 keV for 800V using a 2 '' ET9266B tube. A somewhat better value of 4.3% is obtained using Hamamatsu R10233 tube. On the timing front we have obtained a resolution of 310 ps at Co energy. We have determined the absolute photopeak efficiency of the crystal for 662 keV to be 13.2%, in very close conformity with our Geant4 simulated value of 13.8%. We have estimated from the measurements the actual internal activity of the crystal to be less than 0.045 counts cm(-3) s(-1). It has been concluded that while CeBr3 is just marginally inferior to LaBr3:Ce in terms of energy and timing resolutions, it scores over LaBr3:Ce in terms of internal activity. Unlike LaBr3:Ce, CeBr3 is much purer and has no significant gamma and beta activity.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available