4.3 Article

Off-axis parameters of PAL-XFEL planar undulator

Journal

JOURNAL OF INSTRUMENTATION
Volume 16, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/1748-0221/16/01/T01002

Keywords

Acceleration cavities and superconducting magnets (high-temperature superconductor; radiation hardened magnets; normal-conducting; permanent magnet devices; wigglers and undulators); Accelerator Subsystems and Technologies

Funding

  1. National Research Foundation ofKorea grant funded by theKorea government (MSIT) [2017R1C1B1012852, 2018R1D1A1B07043452]
  2. National Research Foundation of Korea [2018R1D1A1B07043452, 2017R1C1B1012852] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This report presents the systematic measurements of phase error and trajectory deflection at vertical off-axes of a PAL-XFEL hard X-ray undulator, highlighting the importance of aligning the vertical magnetic center to the reference electron beam path during the alignment process.
The electron beam path in a planar undulator is usually chosen at the undulator magnetic center in both the vertical and horizontal directions. In the case of the vertical-gap undulators of x-ray free-electron lasers, best efforts are paid to align the vertical magnetic center to the reference electron beam path. The twenty undulator segments are aligned vertically within 50 mu m to obtain the target K-values of the undulator segments in the PAL-XFEL hard X-ray beamline. Besides K-value, undulator phase error and beam trajectory deflection are also concerned when the undulator is misaligned to the beam path. In some cases, an off-set in the vertical direction is applied intentionally when a transverse field gradient is required. In this report, we present the systematic measurements of the phase error and trajectory deflection at vertical off-axes of a PAL-XFEL hard X-ray undulator.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available