4.7 Article

Solubility determination of surface-active components from dynamic surface tension data

Journal

JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL AND ENGINEERING CHEMISTRY
Volume 92, Issue -, Pages 297-302

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jiec.2020.09.019

Keywords

Solubility; Dynamic surface tension; Dibutyl phthalate; Surface-Active component; Pendant bubble tensiometer

Funding

  1. Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan [MOST 108-2923-E-011-004-MY3]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A new technique of utilizing the dynamic surface tension (ST) data for solubility determination was proposed, tested, and verified in this study. Dibutyl phthalate was chosen as the surface-active component and its solutions were prepared with 0, 1, and 5 wt.% aqueous methanol (MeOH) solutions. The solutions for ST measurement were prepared by stirring the aqueous DBP mixtures in a heated water bath (45 degrees C) for an extended duration of time. The data revealed that an increase in DBP concentration corresponded to a more rapid relaxation of dynamic ST and reached a lower equilibrium ST; similar to that observed amongst typical micelle forming surfactants (at C < cmc). Unlike surfactants, an increase in concentration beyond a certain value corresponded to near-identical relaxations of dynamic ST and the same equilibrium ST. For typical surfactants, although the equilibrium ST remained constant when concentration was increased at C > cmc, the dynamic ST relaxations became increasingly rapid. These inconsistencies in dynamic ST behavior pointed towards the absence of micelle formation amongst the DBP molecules. Based on the dynamic ST data, the solubility of DBP in water, 1 wt.%, and 5 wt.% MeOH(aq) were found to be similar to 6.1, similar to 4.4, and similar to 4.7 (10(-8) mol/cm(3)), respectively. (C) 2020 Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of The Korean Society of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available