4.6 Article

Cutting Edge: Mouse SARS-CoV-2 Epitope Reveals Infection and Vaccine-Elicited CD8 T Cell Responses

Journal

JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGY
Volume 206, Issue 5, Pages 931-935

Publisher

AMER ASSOC IMMUNOLOGISTS
DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.2001400

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Office of the Dean of the University of Minnesota Medical School
  2. Howard Hughes Medical Institute Faculty Scholar program
  3. Canadian Institutes of Health Research Fellowship
  4. National Institutes of Health [F30 DK114942]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The strength of SARS-CoV-2-specific T cell responses is negatively correlated with disease severity, suggesting a role for T cells in primary control. Vaccine-induced T cell immunity may enhance durable protection and cross-reactivity with viral variants. Identification of a dominant CD8 T cell SARS-CoV-2 nucleoprotein epitope in mice enabled better mechanistic and vaccination studies.
The magnitude of SARS-CoV-2-specific T cell responses correlates inversely with human disease severity, suggesting T cell involvement in primary control. Whereas many COVID-19 vaccines focus on establishing humoral immunity to viral spike protein, vaccine-elicited T cell immunity may bolster durable protection or cross-reactivity with viral variants. To better enable mechanistic and vaccination studies in mice, we identified a dominant CD8 T cell SARS-CoV-2 nucleoprotein epitope. Infection of human ACE2 transgenic mice with SARS-CoV-2 elicited robust responses to H2-D-b/N219-227, and 40% of HLA-A*02+ COVID-19 PBMC samples isolated from hospitalized patients responded to this peptide in culture. In mice, i.m. prime-boost nucleoprotein vaccination with heterologous vectors favored systemic CD8 T cell responses, whereas intranasal boosting favored respiratory immunity. In contrast, a single i.v. immunization with recombinant adenovirus established robust CD8 T cell memory both systemically and in the respiratory mucosa.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available