4.3 Article

Towards an evaluation of bedload transport characteristics by using Doppler and backscatter outputs from ADCPs

Journal

JOURNAL OF HYDRAULIC RESEARCH
Volume 59, Issue 5, Pages 703-723

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/00221686.2020.1818311

Keywords

Acoustic Doppler current profiler; backscattering strength; bedload apparent velocity; bedload transport

Funding

  1. Norges Forskningsrad (Norwegian research Council)
  2. Statkraft, Hydropower company as part of the multidisciplinary project SEDIPASS

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study demonstrated that acoustic Doppler current profilers can assist in the assessment of bedload material. The results showed that the 2 MHz ADCP underestimated particle velocity, while the backscattering strength of the M9 device was negatively correlated with bedload concentration, suggesting potential for a methodology based solely on acoustic outputs for bedload quantification.
Both the apparent bedload velocity and the backscattering strength measured by acoustic Doppler current profilers could assist bedload assessment in the field. To test this hypothesis, two ADCPs working at three frequencies (3 MHz and 1 MHz, M9; 2 MHz, StreamPro) were deployed simultaneously to measure seven different bedload transport conditions in a laboratory flume. The bedload transport was monitored by two high-speed cameras and a bedload trap. For some experiments 3 MHz and 1 MHz delivered spatially averaged apparent velocity, for others the velocity corresponded to the average velocity of particles. The 2 MHz severely underestimated the average particle velocity. The M9 backscattering strength decreased as the bedload concentration increased, independently of the size and velocity of transported particles. The 2 MHz resulted in almost constant backscattering strength. These findings demonstrate that further examination of the acoustic configurations and parameters could lead to a methodology for bedload quantification based solely on the acoustic outputs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available