4.7 Article

Mitigation of harmful chemical formation from pyrolysis of tobacco waste using CO2

Journal

JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
Volume 401, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.123416

Keywords

Waste-to-energy; Pyrolysis; Tobacco waste; Carbon dioxide; Syngas; Biochar

Funding

  1. National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) - Korea government (MSIT) [NRF-2019H1A2A1076293, NRF-2019H1D3A1A01070644]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A study was conducted on converting tobacco waste into syngas using CO2-mediated thermochemical process, which proved to be effective in reducing the formations of harmful chemical species.
Global consumption of tobacco has been continuously increasing. This results in the considerable generation of toxic waste materials from the tobacco industry and daily life. Conventional disposal methods for them (incineration and landfilling) could be a potential hazard for releasing carcinogens and toxins into our eco-system. Accordingly, an eco-friendly disposal platform for converting tobacco waste (TW) into syngas was mainly studied in this present work. To realize this, pyrolysis of two commercial cigarette products (Marlboro and HEETS (electronic cigarette)) was done under the CO2/N-2 conditions. One of the main findings from the present study was that CO2 reacted with volatile matters (VMs) obtained from the thermolysis of TW through the gas phase reactions (GPR5), which provided a strategic measure to manipulate carbon rearrangement of all pyrolysates. In particular, the GPR5 expedited the carbon rearrangement of harmful chemical species, converting toxic chemicals into syngas. When the fraction of VMs in TWs increased, the GPR were more effective. Therefore, the introduced eco-friendly method using CO2-mediated thermochemical process could be beneficial for energy recovery from TWs while mitigating the formations of harmful chemical species.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available