4.4 Article

Twenty-first century response of Petermann Glacier, northwest Greenland to ice shelf loss

Journal

JOURNAL OF GLACIOLOGY
Volume 67, Issue 261, Pages 147-157

Publisher

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/jog.2020.97

Keywords

Glacier flow; glacier modelling; ice-shelf break-up

Funding

  1. Natural Environment Research Council Doctoral Scholarship [NE/L002590/1]
  2. Newcastle University, UK

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Thinning or collapse of ice shelves can accelerate ice flow, increase ice discharge, and raise global mean sea levels. The response of Petermann Glacier to total ice shelf loss is uncertain, but it is likely to have minimal impact on global mean sea level. Further research is needed to understand the sensitivity of the glacier to ice shelf changes in the future.
Ice shelves restrain flow from the Greenland and Antarctic ice sheets. Climate-ocean warming could force thinning or collapse of floating ice shelves and subsequently accelerate flow, increase ice discharge and raise global mean sea levels. Petermann Glacier (PG), northwest Greenland, recently lost large sections of its ice shelf, but its response to total ice shelf loss in the future remains uncertain. Here, we use the ice flow model ua to assess the sensitivity of PG to changes in ice shelf extent, and to estimate the resultant loss of grounded ice and contribution to sea level rise. Our results have shown that under several scenarios of ice shelf thinning and retreat, removal of the shelf will not contribute substantially to global mean sea level (<1 mm). We hypothesize that grounded ice loss was limited by the stabilization of the grounding line at a topographic high similar to 12 km inland of its current grounding line position. Further inland, the likelihood of a narrow fjord that slopes seawards suggests that PG is likely to remain insensitive to terminus changes in the near future.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available