4.7 Article

A mouse model of human TLR4 D299G/T399I SNPs reveals mechanisms of altered LPS and pathogen responses

Journal

JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE
Volume 218, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

ROCKEFELLER UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1084/jem.20200675

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health [AI123371, S10 OD025101, AI125215, AI082299, AI123467, GM133126]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study identified homologous substitutions of two SNPs in murine Tlr4, which are associated with human TLR4, using advanced protein modeling techniques. By creating a knock-in strain expressing these SNPs and studying their effects on TLR4 signaling, the research provided new insights into how these SNPs decrease TLR4 signaling efficiency and offered an experimental approach to validate or refute human data.
Two cosegregating single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in human TLR4, an A896G transition at SNP rs4986790 (D299G) and a C1196T transition at SNP rs4986791 (T399I), have been associated with LPS hyporesponsiveness and differential susceptibility to many infectious or inflammatory diseases. However, many studies failed to confirm these associations, and transfection experiments resulted in conflicting conclusions about the impact of these SNPs on TLR4 signaling. Using advanced protein modeling from crystallographic data of human and murine TLR4, we identified homologous substitutions of these SNPs in murine Tlr4, engineered a knock-in strain expressing the D298G and N397I TLR4 SNPs homozygously, and characterized in vivo and in vitro responses to TLR4 ligands and infections in which TLR4 is implicated. Our data provide new insights into cellular and molecular mechanisms by which these SNPs decrease the TLR4 signaling efficiency and offer an experimental approach to confirm or refute human data possibly confounded by variables unrelated to the direct effects of the SNPs on TLR4 functionality.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available