4.2 Article

Immediate implant placement and loading in the esthetic area when the buccal socket wall is significantly damaged

Journal

JOURNAL OF ESTHETIC AND RESTORATIVE DENTISTRY
Volume 33, Issue 4, Pages 542-549

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/jerd.12707

Keywords

esthetic rehabilitation; bone fenestration; deep bone dehiscence; immediate implant loading; immediate implant placement; implants

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study presented a surgical approach using connective tissue graft for immediate implant placement and loading when the buccal bone wall is damaged, showing promising esthetic results and patient satisfaction after 1 year of loading.
Objectives Recent clinical recommendations contraindicate immediate implant placement when the socket buccal bone plate is significantly damaged. The connective tissue graft (CTG) is increasingly being used in implant therapy and can replace periodontal defects lacking bone wall in periodontal regenerative surgery. Therefore, CTG could be used to allow immediate implant placement and loading even when the buccal socket wall is damaged, facilitating graft material stability. Clinical considerations In the first case, deep bone dehiscence was caused by a vertical root fracture. In the second case, a big bone fenestration was caused by a chronic endodontic periapical lesion. Both cases were treated with immediate implant placement and loading. A buccal CTG was used to compensate for the lack of bone and allow stabilization of the particulate xenograft in the gap between the implant and the damaged buccal socket wall. In both cases, a provisional screw-retained crown was immediately delivered, and the definitive layered zirconia crown was delivered after 3 months. Esthetic results and patient satisfaction monitored for 1 year after loading proved to be encouraging. Conclusions Although further investigations with longer follow-up are required, the approach is likely to yield good results after 1 year of loading. Clinical Significance The purpose of this report is to show a surgical approach that seems to be able to overcome the contraindication of the quoted consensus report, which allows for good esthetic results and patient satisfaction even when the buccal bone wall of the extraction socket has been more than 50% compromised, allowing treatment time and cost reduction.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available