4.2 Article

When to save or remove implants in the smile zone: A clinical report of maxillary lateral incisor implants in malposition

Journal

JOURNAL OF ESTHETIC AND RESTORATIVE DENTISTRY
Volume 33, Issue 1, Pages 194-201

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/jerd.12705

Keywords

crown contour; dental implants; implant decoronation; midfacial recession defect; ridge augmentation; submergence profile

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This clinical report addresses the decision-making process for saving or removing implants with esthetic deficiencies in the smile zone, as well as the sequence and timing of interdisciplinary treatment. Key factors in treating implants in malposition include restorative position, absence of disease, and adequate depth. Understanding interdisciplinary treatment planning and techniques is essential for achieving desired esthetic results when dealing with implants in malposition in the smile zone.
Objective The following is a clinical report addressing when to save or remove implants with esthetic deficiencies in the smile zone as well as the sequence and timing of interdisciplinary treatment. Clinical considerations Key factors in the decision-making process in treating implants in malposition are whether the implants are (1) in a reasonable restorative position, (2) free of disease, and (3) placed with adequate depth. This clinical report encompassed periodontal corrective surgery, non-surgical soft tissue sculpting through subgingival crown contour, material selection for definitive restorations, and cementation techniques for cement-retained restorations. Clinical significance Knowledge and understanding of interdisciplinary treatment planning, sequencing, and respective techniques that can be implemented when confronting implants in malposition in the smile zone will allow the interdisciplinary team to achieve the desired esthetic restorative result.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available