4.7 Article

Curvature of planar aesthetic curves

Journal

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.cam.2020.113042

Keywords

Aesthetic curve; Class A curve; Bezier; Curvature; Subdivision

Funding

  1. Spanish Ministerio de Economia y Competitividad [TRA2015-67788-P]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Farin (2006) proposed a method for designing Bezier curves with monotonic curvature and torsion, defining Class A curves and introducing new generation conditions without the requirement for eigenvalue conditions to be preserved under subdivision of the curve.
In Farin (2006) Farin proposed a method for designing Bezier curves with monotonic curvature and torsion. Such curves are relevant in design due to their aesthetic shape. The method relies on applying a matrix M to the first edge of the control polygon of the curve in order to obtain by iteration the remaining edges. With this method, sufficient conditions on the matrix M are provided, which lead to the definition of Class A curves, generalizing a previous result by Mineur et al. (1998) for plane curves with M being the composition of a dilatation and a rotation. However, Cao and Wang (2008) have shown counterexamples for such conditions. In this paper, we revisit Farin's idea of using the subdivision algorithm to relate the curvature at every point of the curve to the curvature at the initial point in order to produce a closed formula for the curvature of planar curves in terms of the eigenvalues of the matrix M and the seed vector for the curve, the first edge of the control polygon. Moreover, we give new conditions in order to produce planar curves with monotonic curvature. The main difference is that we do not require our conditions on the eigenvalues to be preserved under subdivision of the curve. This facilitates giving a unified derivation of the existing results and obtain more general results in the planar case. (C) 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available