4.3 Article

Molecular method for the detection of Andes hantavirus infection: validation for clinical diagnostics

Journal

DIAGNOSTIC MICROBIOLOGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASE
Volume 84, Issue 1, Pages 36-39

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2015.07.019

Keywords

Hantavirus; Andes virus; Diagnosis; RT-qPCR

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Allergy and Infectious Diseases at the National Institutes of Health [5UI9AI045452]
  2. Fondo Nacional de Investigacion y Desarrollo en Salud [SA07I20045]
  3. Fondo Nacional de Desarrollo de Cientifico y Tecnologico [11110397]
  4. Plan de Mejoramiento Institucional PMI UDD [1204]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Hantavirus cardiopulmonary syndrome is a severe disease caused by exposure to New World hantaviruses. Early diagnosis is difficult due to the lack of specific initial symptoms. Antihantavirus antibodies are usually negative until late in the febrile prodrome or the beginning of cardiopulmonary phase, while Andes hantavirus (ANDV) RNA genome can be detected before symptoms onset. We analyzed the effectiveness of quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) as a diagnostic tool detecting ANDV-Sout genome in peripheral blood cells from 78 confirmed hantavirus patients and 166 negative controls. Our results indicate that RT-qPCR had a low detection limit (similar to 10 copies), with a specificity of 100% and a sensitivity of 94.9%. This suggests the potential for establishing RT-qPCR as the assay of choice for early diagnosis, promoting early effective care of patients, and improving other important aspects of ANDV infection management, such as compliance of biosafety recommendations for health personnel in order to avoid nosocomial transmission. (C) 2016 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available