Success Rate of Obtaining Baseline Somatosensory and Motor Evoked Potentials in 695 Consecutive Cranial and Spine Surgeries

Purpose: Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring has been well documented as an adjunctive technique that significantly decreases the risk of developing inadvertent sensory and motor deficits during cranial and spine surgeries. The ability to detect neurologic problems intraoperatively depends largely on accurately identifying changes that occur in somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEPs) and motor evoked potentials (MEPs) during each procedure. Therefore, obtaining accurate and reproducible SSEP and MEP data during the initial setup is paramount for intraoperative monitoring. In 2007, Chen et al. found the overall success rate for establishing reliable MEP responses to be 94.8% in the upper extremities and 66.6% in the lower extremities. Since then, the success rate of obtaining baseline sensory and motor evoked potential responses has not been specifically reevaluated. The main goal of this study was to evaluate the current success rates of obtaining adequate SSEP and MEP baseline data in the current era, as well as take a closer look into some of the factors that can reduce the success rates. Methods: Somatosensory evoked potential and MEP monitoring was attempted in a total of 695 consecutive brain and spine surgeries performed by neurosurgeons and orthopedic surgeons between January 2010 and July 2011. Somatosensory evoked potential and MEP baseline data were obtained after initiation of general anesthesia and before skin incision. The primary measure is the ability to obtain adequate SSEP and MEP baseline in each extremity. A secondary measure was to stratify the success rate based on preoperative diagnosis. Results: Six hundred ninety-five consecutive cranial and spinal cases that required intraoperative monitoring were reviewed. Baseline upper extremity SSEPs were successfully obtained in 679 cases (98.1%), and baseline lower extremity SSEPs were successfully obtained in 626 cases (90.1%). However, if the preoperative diagnosis was in the category spine trauma or spine infection, the success rate of obtaining adequate baseline in the lower extremities dropped to around 60% for both SSEPs and MEPs. Conclusions: The success rates of obtaining adequate baseline SSEP and MEP data are overall higher than previously reported. Preoperative diagnosis like spinal infection or trauma may predict lower success rates for acquiring adequate baseline SSEPs and MEPs.

Automated summary

Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring is important for decreasing the risk of sensory and motor deficits during cranial and spine surgeries. This study evaluates the success rates of obtaining baseline SSEP and MEP data, and finds that preoperative diagnosis can affect the success rates, particularly in cases of spine infection or trauma.