4.7 Article

Saliva Is a Promising Alternative Specimen for the Detection of SARS-CoV-2 in Children and Adults

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY
Volume 59, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

AMER SOC MICROBIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1128/JCM.02686-20

Keywords

COVID-19; SARS-CoV-2; nasopharyngeal swab; pediatric; saliva

Categories

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health [U01 AI144616-02S1]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Overall concordances for saliva and NPS were 91.0% and 94.7% respectively, with positive percent agreement (PPA) values of 81.4% and 89.7%. Saliva detected 10 additional positive cases compared to NPS. Both saliva and NPS showed comparable performance for symptomatic and asymptomatic pediatric patients not previously diagnosed with COVID-19.
Testing efforts for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) have been burdened by the scarcity of testing materials and personal protective equipment for health care workers. The simple and painless process of saliva collection allows for widespread testing, but enthusiasm is hampered by variable performance compared to that of nasopharyngeal swab (NPS) samples. We prospectively collected paired NPS and saliva samples from a total of 300 unique adult and pediatric patients. SARS-CoV-2 RNA was detected in 32.2% (97/300) of the individuals using the TaqPath COVID-19 Combo kit (Thermo Fisher). Performance of saliva and NPS was compared against the total number of positives regardless of specimen type. The overall concordances for saliva and NPS were 91.0% (273/300) and 94.7% (284/300), respectively. The values for positive percent agreement (PPA) for saliva and NPS were 81.4% (79/97) and 89.7% (87/97), respectively. Saliva yielded detection of 10 positive cases that were negative by NPS. For symptomatic and asymptomatic pediatric patients not previously diagnosed with COVID-19, the performances of saliva and NPS were comparable (PPA, 82.4% versus 85.3%). The overall values for PPA for adults were 83.3% and 90.7% for saliva and NPS, respectively, with saliva yielding detection of 4 fewer cases than NPS. However, saliva performance for symptomatic adults was identical to NPS performance (PPA of 93.8%). With lower cost and self-collection capabilities, saliva can be an appropriate sample choice alternative to NPS for detection of SARS-CoV-2 in children and adults.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available