4.7 Review

Arsenic removal technologies and future trends: A mini review

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION
Volume 278, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123805

Keywords

Arsenic; Arsenic contamination; Removal techniques; Health hazards; Toxicity; Arsenic occurrence

Funding

  1. Fundamental Research Grant Scheme [R.J130000.7854.5F102]
  2. Geran Universiti Penyelidikan [Q.J130000.1545.17H14 (GUP TIER 1)]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Arsenic contamination is recognized as a significant environmental issue, with its remediation being crucial for the health of plants, animals, humans, and the overall ecosystem. This review comprehensively examines arsenic toxicities and removal techniques, including adsorption, ion exchange, and phytoremediation, among others.
Arsenic contamination has been widely recognized as one of the most consequential environmental pollutants due to its anthropogenic activities. Arsenic toxicity and remediation have become the focus of many institutions, including industries, environmental groups, and the general public. The treatment of arsenic contamination is of irrefutable significance to lower floras and faunas, humanity, and their living ecosystem. This review comprehensively examines different arsenic toxicities to the environment and their associated removal techniques. To begin with, the appraisal focuses on the general background of arsenic occurrences in the environment, its related health hazards, and measurement techniques. In addition, it also provides a comprehensive discussion of how arsenic impurities can be removed from the environment using diverse established and advanced technologies like adsorption, ion exchanges, electrokinetic processes, electrocoagulation, chemical precipitation, phytoremediation, nano phytoremediation, membrane technology, and phytobial remediation. Finally, the pros and cons of the remediation/removal methods are enumerated, as well as their principal ongoing accomplishments. The simplicity, low cost, and easy operational procedure of adsorption technique and use of novel functional materials such as graphite oxides, metal organic frameworks, carbon nanotubes and other new forms of functional materials are better future alternatives for arsenic removal. (C) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available