4.6 Article

Enhanced extraction using a combination of stir bar sorptive extraction and thin film-solid phase microextraction

Journal

JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY A
Volume 1633, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2020.461617

Keywords

Sample preparation; Headspace; Direct Immersion; SBSE; TFSPME

Funding

  1. Gerstel LLP
  2. Mane SEA PTE LTD

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Sorptive extraction techniques have experienced increased popularity, but they face limitations in dy-namic range and sensitivity. In this study, a new method combining stir bar sorptive extraction (SBSE) and thin-film solid-phase microextraction (TFSPME) was developed, and optimization for extraction temperature (70 degrees C) and time (120 min) was carried out. Polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS)-coated SBSE and PDMS/carboxen (PDMS/CAR)-coated TFSPME were used, and both headspace and direct immersion extraction modes were also studied. Using 40 selected volatile compounds, the combined method generally gave a wider linearity range with lower minimum limits (2 to 3 orders), satisfactory coefficient of determination (R 2 0.980), and improved sensitivity when compared to SBSE-only or TFSPME-only techniques. Furthermore, despite the combined use of two extraction devices, the repeatability (< 13.1 %) and reproducibility (< 13.4 %) of the combined method were comparable to SBSE-only or TFSPME-only results. Higher recoveries of up to 20% were also achieved by the combined method. Compared to the conventional SBSE method, the new method provided superior performance in terms of dynamic range and sensitivity for compounds of various polarities. In conclusion, this study provided insights on the suitability of the various extraction methods for compounds of different chemical properties which could aid in future applications for volatiles analysis in food, biological, and environmental sectors. (c) 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available