4.7 Article

Modeling Molecules under Pressure with Gaussian Potentials

Journal

JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL THEORY AND COMPUTATION
Volume 17, Issue 1, Pages 583-597

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jctc.0c01212

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) [GRK 1986, STA 1526/1-1, STA 1526/2-1]
  2. Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, of the U.S. Department of Energy [DE-AC02-05CH11231]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The GOSTSHYP approach is a new electronic structure method for modeling atoms and molecules under pressure, allowing for straightforward geometry optimizations and ab initio molecular dynamics simulations. Results obtained under pressure using GOSTSHYP fall within the range of established computational methods for high-pressure chemistry, demonstrating its ability to successfully model pressure-induced chemical reactions.
The computational modeling of molecules under high pressure is a growing research area that augments experimental high-pressure chemistry. Here, a new electronic structure method for modeling atoms and molecules under pressure, Gaussians On Surface Tesserae Simulate HYdrostatic Pressure (GOSTSHYP) approach, is introduced. In this method, a set of Gaussian potentials is distributed evenly on the van der Waals surface of the investigated chemical system, leading to a compression of the electron density and the atomic scaffold. Since no parameters other than pressure need to be specified, GOSTSHYP allows straightforward geometry optimizations and ab initio molecular dynamics simulations of chemical systems under pressure for nonexpert users. Calculated energies, bond lengths, and dipole moments under pressure fall within the range of established computational methods for high-pressure chemistry. A Diels-Alder reaction and the cyclotrimerization of acetylene showcase the ability of GOSTSHYP to model pressure-induced chemical reactions. The connection to mechanochemistry is pointed out.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available