4.2 Article

Memory and dendritic spines loss, and dynamic dendritic spines changes are age-dependent in the rat

Journal

JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL NEUROANATOMY
Volume 110, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jchemneu.2020.101858

Keywords

Aging; Prefrontal cortex; Hippocampus; Memory and learning; dendritic spines; Locomotor activity; Pyramidal neurons

Funding

  1. Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y tecnologia CONACYT [252808]
  2. PRODEP [CA-BUAP-120]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Brain aging is a widely studied process, but due to its complexity, much of its progress is unknown. There are many studies linking memory loss and reduced interneuronal communication with brain aging. However, only a few studies compare young and old animals. In the present study, in male rats aged 3, 6, and 18 months, we analyzed the locomotor activity and also short and long-term memory using the novel object recognition test (NORT), in addition to evaluating the dendritic length and the number of dendritic spines in the prefrontal cortex (PFC) and in the CA1, CA3 and DG regions of the dorsal hippocampus using Golgi-Cox staining. We also analyzed the types of dendritic spines in the aforementioned regions. 6 and 18-month old animals showed a reduction in locomotor activity, while long-term memory deficit was observed in 18-month old rats. At 18 months old, the dendritic length was reduced in all the studied regions. The dendritic spine number was also reduced in layer 5 of the PFC, and the CA1 and CA3 of the hippocampus. The dynamics of dendritic spines changed with age, with a reduction of the mushroom spines in all the studied regions, with an increase of the stubby spines in all the studied regions except from the CA3 region, that showed a reduction. Our data suggest that age causes changes in behavior, which may be the result of morphological changes at the dendrite level, both in their length and in the dynamics of their spines.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available