4.5 Article

Integrating Natural Product Chemistry Workflows into Medicinal Chemistry Laboratory Training: Building the PRISM Library and Cultivating Independent Research

Journal

JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL EDUCATION
Volume 98, Issue 2, Pages 410-415

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jchemed.0c00396

Keywords

Upper-Division Undergraduate; Laboratory Instruction; Hands-On Learning/Manipulatives; Natural Products; Medicinal Chemistry

Funding

  1. URI Department of Biomedical and Pharmaceutical Sciences
  2. URI College of Pharmacy
  3. University of Rhode Island
  4. National Science Foundation EPSCoR Cooperative Agreement [EPS-1004057]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Students enhanced their understanding of methodologies and workflows associated with extract analysis and biological evaluation of botanical extracts through hands-on laboratory activities, and the synergy of the laboratory course with independent research contributed to workforce preparation and library generation.
Chemical screening libraries often feature natural product extracts (NPEs) due to the intriguing biological activities they possess and the structural diversity found in their individual components. A research project originally designed to create an extract library of every specimen in the University of Rhode Island (URI) Heber W. Youngken Jr. Medicinal Garden soon turned into a laboratory-based teaching project in which upper-division undergraduate students generated and analyzed extracts in an academic minisemester project. Additionally, motivated upper-division undergraduates carried out independent research isolating biologically active molecules. Hands-on laboratory activities enhanced students' knowledge of methodologies and workflows associated with extract analysis and biological evaluation of botanical extracts. The synergy of the laboratory course with the independent study contributed to workforce preparation and library generation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available