4.5 Article

Biphasic regulation of glutamine consumption by WNT during osteoblast differentiation

Journal

JOURNAL OF CELL SCIENCE
Volume 134, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

COMPANY BIOLOGISTS LTD
DOI: 10.1242/jcs.251645

Keywords

WNT; beta-catenin; Glutamine; Osteoblast; Slc1a5; Slc7a7

Categories

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health [AR060456, AR071967, AR076325]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Osteoblasts have increased demand for amino acids to support bone matrix synthesis, with WNT signaling rapidly inducing glutamine uptake through specific amino acid transporters. This process is critical for osteoblast differentiation.
Osteoblasts are the principal bone-forming cells. As such, osteoblasts have enhanced demand for amino acids to sustain high rates of matrix synthesis associated with bone formation. The precise systems utilized by osteoblasts to meet these synthetic demands are not well understood. WNT signaling is known to rapidly stimulate glutamine uptake during osteoblast differentiation. Using a cell biology approach, we identified two amino acid transporters, gamma(+)-LAT1 and ASCT2 (encoded by Slc7a7 and Slc1a5, respectively), as the primary transporters of glutamine in response to WNT. ASCT2 mediates the majority of glutamine uptake, whereas.(+)-LAT1 mediates the rapid increase in glutamine uptake in response to WNT. Mechanistically, WNT signals through the canonical beta-catenin (CTNNB1)-dependent pathway to rapidly induce Slc7a7 expression. Conversely, Slc1a5 expression is regulated by the transcription factor ATF4 downstream of the mTORC1 pathway. Targeting either Slc1a5 or Slc7a7 using shRNA reduced WNT-induced glutamine uptake and prevented osteoblast differentiation. Collectively, these data highlight the critical nature of glutamine transport for WNT-induced osteoblast differentiation. This article has an associated First Person interview with the joint first authors of the paper.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available