Journal
JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY
Volume 77, Issue 6, Pages 613-619Publisher
ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jjcc.2020.12.006
Keywords
Aortic stenosis; Echocardiography; Point-of-care ultrasonography; Focused cardiac ultrasound; Emergency department
Categories
Ask authors/readers for more resources
The study evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of a visual AS score developed by emergency physicians for screening AS. The results showed that a visual AS score >3 had high sensitivity, specificity, and predictive value for diagnosing moderate or severe AS, and patients with a score >3 had a higher prevalence of AS-related events during hospitalization.
Background: No established methodology exists for diagnosis of aortic stenosis (AS) using focused cardiac ultrasound (FOCUS). We evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of our developed visual AS score for screening AS in an emergency department. Methods: Seventy-two emergency outpatients with suspected cardiovascular disease were studied. Emer-gency physicians assessed the visual AS score in addition to conducting the standard FOCUS, and then the aortic valve area index (AVAI) was measured by expert sonographers in the echocardiography laboratory. AVAI values > 0.85 cm(2)/m(2), 0.6-0.85 cm(2)/m(2), and < 0.6 cm(2)/m(2) were defined as no or mild AS, moderate AS, and severe AS, respectively. Results: Seventeen (24%) patients had moderate or severe AS. Visual AS scores assessed by emergency physicians and by expert sonographers showed excellent agreement (kappa = 0.93), and a strong association was noted between the visual AS score assessed by emergency physicians and the AVAI assessed by ex-pert sonographers (R = -0.71, p < 0.0 0 01). A visual AS score >3 assessed by emergency physicians had a sensitivity of 82%, specificity of 100%, positive predictive value of 100%, and negative predictive value of 95% for diagnosing moderate or severe AS. The prevalence of new-onset AS-related events during hospi-talization was higher in patients with visual AS score >3 assessed by emergency physicians than in the remaining patients [7 (50%) vs. 2 (3%), p < 0.0001]. Conclusion: The visual AS score is a useful AS screening tool for emergency physicians who are not expert cardiologists. (C) 2020 Japanese College of Cardiology. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available