4.4 Article

Roughness and wettability of titanium implant surfaces modify the salivary pellicle composition

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jbm.b.34766

Keywords

dental implants; nano-LC-MS/MS; roughness; salivary pellicle; titanium; wettability

Funding

  1. UNAM-PAPIIT [IA206418, IA208220, IT200319]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study revealed differences in protein composition of salivary pellicles formed on Titanium surfaces with different roughness and wettability, indicating that the physicochemical characteristics of the implant surfaces influence protein adsorption and composition.
This study reports the differences in the protein composition of salivary pellicles formed under in situ conditions on two Titanium (Ti) surfaces, with different roughness and wettability. Smooth pretreatment Ti surfaces (Ti-PT) with an average roughness (Ra) of 0.45 mu m and a water contact angle (WCA) of 92.4 degrees, as well as a more rough sandblasted, large grit, acid-etched treatment Ti surfaces (Ti-SLA) with a Ra of 3.3 mu m and WCA of 131.8 degrees, were tested. The salivary pellicles were quantitatively analyzed by bicinchoninic acid assays, and the protein identification was performed by Nano-LC-MS/MS (nano mass spectrometry). Protein levels of 2.5, and 9.1 mu g/ml were quantified from the detached salivary pellicle formed on the Ti-PT and Ti-SLA surfaces, respectively. Using Nano-LC-MS/MS, a total of 597 proteins were identified on all the substrates tested; 43 proteins were identified only on the Ti-PT, and 226 proteins were adsorbed solely on the Ti-SLA substrates. The physicochemical characteristics of the Ti implant surfaces modified the amount and the identity of the salivary proteome of the pellicles formed, confirming the high selectivity of the protein pellicle formed on a surface once is exposed in the oral cavity.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available