4.6 Article

Learning multimorbidity patterns from electronic health records using Non-negative Matrix Factorisation

Journal

JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICAL INFORMATICS
Volume 112, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbi.2020.103606

Keywords

Non-negative Matrix Factorisation; Multimorbidity; Temporal phenotyping; Disease trajectories; Electronic health records

Funding

  1. Oxford Martin School (OMS), United Kingdom
  2. National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Oxford Biomedical Research Centre (BRC), United Kingdom

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Multimorbidity, or the presence of several medical conditions in the same individual, has been increasing in the population - both in absolute and relative terms. Nevertheless, multimorbidity remains poorly understood, and the evidence from existing research to describe its burden, determinants and consequences has been limited. Previous studies attempting to understand multimorbidity patterns are often cross-sectional and do not explicitly account for multimorbidity patterns' evolution over time; some of them are based on small datasets and/or use arbitrary and narrow age ranges; and those that employed advanced models, usually lack appropriate benchmarking and validations. In this study, we (1) introduce a novel approach for using Non negative Matrix Factorisation (NMF) for temporal phenotyping (i.e., simultaneously mining disease clusters and their trajectories); (2) provide quantitative metrics for the evaluation of these clusters and trajectories; and (3) demonstrate how the temporal characteristics of the disease clusters that result from our model can help mine multimorbidity networks and generate new hypotheses for the emergence of various multimorbidity patterns over time. We trained and evaluated our models on one of the world's largest electronic health records (EHR) datasets, containing more than 7 million patients, from which over 2 million where relevant to, and hence included in this study.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available