Journal
JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY
Volume 36, Issue 5, Pages 1543-1547Publisher
CHURCHILL LIVINGSTONE INC MEDICAL PUBLISHERS
DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2020.12.021
Keywords
total joint arthroplasty; heterotopic ossification; aspirin; venous thromboembolism prophylaxis; postoperative complications
Categories
Ask authors/readers for more resources
The study aimed to examine the influence of aspirin as venous thromboembolism prophylaxis on heterotopic ossification formation following total joint arthroplasty. Results showed that patients receiving aspirin had lower rates of HO after both THA and TKA, suggesting a potential protective effect of aspirin against HO formation.
Background: Heterotopic ossification (HO) is a common complication following total joint arthroplasty (TJA). However, the pathophysiology of HO is not entirely understood. Inflammation may play a significant role in the pathogenesis of HO as nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs are effective in the prevention of HO. The purpose of this study is to examine if aspirin (ASA), when used as venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis, influenced the rate of HO formation following TJA. Methods: We queried our longitudinally maintained database to identify all patients who underwent primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) or total knee arthroplasty (TKA) for osteoarthritis between January 2016 and June 2018 with at least 3-month radiographic follow-up. In total, 1238 THAs and 1051 TKAs were included for analysis. Radiographs were reviewed and HO formation graded according to the Brooker classification. Patient demographic and VTE prophylaxis data were collected and reviewed for accuracy. Univariate and multivariate analysis was performed to evaluate the effect of ASA on HO formation. Results: The overall rate of HO was 37.5% after THA and 17.4% after TKA. Patients receiving ASA were less likely to develop HO after THA (34.8% vs 45.5%; P<.001), as well as HO after TKA (13.4% vs 18.4%; P = .047) compared to patients receiving non-ASA VTE prophylaxis. The rate of HO formation trended to be lower, albeit not statistically significantly, in patients receiving low-dose ASA (81 mg) vs high-dose ASA (325 mg). Conclusion: Patients undergoing primary TJA receiving ASA for VTE prophylaxis were less likely to develop HO compared to patients who were administered non-ASA VTE prophylaxis. (C) 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available