4.3 Article

Experimental evaluation of the GE Discovery 870 CZT clinical SPECT system equipped with WEHR and MEHRS collimator

Journal

JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS
Volume 22, Issue 2, Pages 165-177

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/acm2.13158

Keywords

Discovery NM/CT 870 CZT; medium-energy high-resolution sensitivity collimator; wide-energy high-resolution collimator

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study compared the accuracy of different devices and found that C-SPECT performed well in terms of energy resolution and high-contrast resolution. By setting the scatter correction sub window appropriately, C-SPECT equipped with MEHRS can achieve excellent scattered ray removal effect, allowing for highly homogeneous imaging while maintaining high-contrast resolution.
Purpose: A high-energy-resolution whole-body SPECT-CT device (Discovery NM/CT 870 CZT; C-SPECT) equipped with a CZT detector has been developed and is being used clinically. A MEHRS collimator has also been developed recently, with an expected improvement in imaging accuracy using medium-energy radionuclides. The objective of this study was to compare and analyze the accuracies of the following devices: a WEHR collimator and the MEHRS collimator installed on a C-SPECT, and a NaI scintillation detector-equipped Anger-type SPECT (A-SPECT) scanner, with a LEHR and LMEGP. Methods: A line phantom was used to measure the energy resolutions including collimator characteristics in the planar acquisition of each device using Tc-99m and I-123. We also measured the system's sensitivity and high-contrast resolution using a lead bar phantom. We evaluated SPECT spatial resolution, high-contrast resolution, radioactivity concentration linearity, and homogeneity, using a basic performance evaluation phantom. In addition, the effect of scatter correction was evaluated by varying the sub window (SW) employed for scattering correction. Results: The energy resolution with Tc-99m was 5.6% in C-SPECT with WEHR and 9.9% in A-SPECT with LEHR. Using 123I, the results were 9.1% in C-SPECT with WEHR, 5.5% in C-SPECT with MEHRS, and 10.4% in A-SPECT with LMEGP. The planar spatial resolution was similar under all conditions, but C-SPECT performed better in SPECT acquisition. High-contrast resolution was improved in C-SPECT under planar condition and SPECT. The sensitivity and homogeneity were improved by setting the SW for scattering correction to 3% of the main peak in C-SPECT. Conclusion: C-SPECT demonstrates excellent energy resolution and improved high-contrast resolution for each radionuclide. In addition, when using 123I, careful attention should be paid to SW for scatter correction. By setting the appropriate SW, C-SPECT with MEHRS has an excellent scattered ray removal effect, and highly homogenous imaging is possible while maintaining the high-contrast resolution.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available