4.7 Article

Core-shell structured CuCo2S4@CoMoO4 nanorods for advanced electrode materials

Journal

JOURNAL OF ALLOYS AND COMPOUNDS
Volume 844, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2020.156133

Keywords

Core-shell; Supercapacitor; Transition metal oxides; Nanorods

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51861005, 51708191]
  2. Guangxi Natural Science Foundation [2019GXNSFDA245023, 2019GXNSFGA245005]
  3. Hubei Superior and Distinctive Discipline Group of Mechatronics and Automobiles [XKQ2020035]
  4. GUET Excellent Graduate Thesis Program [18YJPYSS33]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Transition metal oxides and sulfides exhibit excellent electrochemical properties owing to their various valence states, high electrical conductivities, large number of active sites, and superior electrochemical activities. In this study, core-shell structured CuCo2S4@CoMoO4 nanorods were prepared on nickel foam via the combination of the hydrothermal method and calcination. The CuCo2S4@CoMoO4 heterostructure shows improved electrochemical performance. The CuCo2S4 nanorods provided channels for rapid electron transport and effectively dispersed CoMoO4 particles, while the outer CoMoO4 shell inhibited the expansion of the inner CuCo2S4 nanorods during the redox reaction and increased the stability of the produced composite. The electrode fabricated from the CuCo2S4@CoMoO4 nanorod array grown on nickel foam possessed a high specific capacitance of 2058 F g(-1) (5557 mF cm(-2)) at 1 mA cm(-2). The asymmetrical supercapacitor formed after the addition of an activated carbon negative electrode demonstrated a high energy density of 45.73 W h kg(-1) at a power density of 198.8 W kg(-1). Further, it exhibited an outstanding cycling stability that corresponded to 83% specific capacitance retention after 3000 charge-discharge cycles. (c) 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available