4.7 Article

Preferential Co and Fe atom occupancy in R2(Fe1-xCox)14B intermetallic compounds (R = Nd, Y and Ce)

Journal

JOURNAL OF ALLOYS AND COMPOUNDS
Volume 851, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2020.156168

Keywords

Permanent magnets; Preferential site occupancy; Crystal structure; Neutron powder diffraction; Magnetocrystalline anisotropy

Funding

  1. future pioneering program Development of magnetic material technology for high-efficiency motors (MagHEM), Japan [JPNP14015]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study revealed that atom substitution in Nd-2(Fe1-xCox)(14)B, Y-2(Fe1-xCox)(14)B and Ce-2(Fe1-xCox)(14)B compounds shows some regularity, depending on the ratio of Co to Fe content. Steric hindrance primarily determines atom substitution, and enthalpy of mixing must also be considered for a more accurate description of Co preferential occupancies.
A powder neutron scattering study of atom substitution in Nd-2(Fe1-xCox)(14)B, Y-2(Fe1-xCox)(14)B and Ce-2(Fe1-xCox)(14)B compounds is presented. Compared to previous studies, this one benefits from the considerable progress made in neutron diffraction measurements and their analysis during the last 15 years. The normalization of the occupancy values to those expected for a random distribution permits to reveal small deviations from random distribution. On all crystallographic sites some preferential occupancy is evidenced, the extent of which depends on the Co versus Fe content. A statistical model quantitatively describing site occupancies is proposed, which allows us to study the extreme cases of very dilute substitutions. Steric considerations primarily determine atom substitution, more particularly Fe-substitution in Co-rich compounds. The enthalpy of mixing must also be considered to describe Co preferential occupancies more exactly. (C) 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available