Journal
JOURNAL OF AFFECTIVE DISORDERS
Volume 277, Issue -, Pages 425-435Publisher
ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2020.08.052
Keywords
Major depressive disorder; Sleep deprivation; neural plasticity; Transcranial magnetic stimulation; Synaptic homeostasis hypothesis
Categories
Funding
- FAZIT foundation
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Medical Center University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Germany
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Background: Therapeutic sleep deprivation (SD) presents a unique paradigm to study the neurobiology of major depressive disorder (MDD). However, the rapid antidepressant mechanism, which differs from today's slow first -line treatments, is not sufficiently understood. We recently integrated two prominent hypotheses of MDD and sleep, the synaptic plasticity hypothesis of MDD and the synaptic homeostasis hypothesis of sleep-wake regulation, into a synaptic plasticity model of therapeutic SD in MDD. Here, we further tested this model positing that homeostatically elevating net synaptic strength through therapeutic SD shifts the initially deficient inducibility of associative synaptic long-term potentiation (LTP)-like plasticity in patients with MDD into a more favorable window of associative plasticity. Methods: We used paired associative stimulation (PAS), a transcranial magnetic stimulation protocol (TMS), to quantify cortical LTP-like plasticity after one night of therapeutic sleep deprivation in 28 patients with MDD. Results: We demonstrate a significantly different inducibility of associative plasticity in clinical responders to therapeutic SD (> 50% improvement on the 6-item Hamilton-Rating-Scale for Depression, n=13) compared to non-responders (n=15), which was driven by a long-term depression (LTD)-like response in SD-non-responders. Indices of global net synaptic strength (wake EEG theta activity, intracortical inhibition and BDNF serum levels) were increased after SD in both groups, with responders showing a generally lower intracortical inhibition than non-responders. Limitations: Repetitive assessments prior to and after treatment would be needed to further determine potential mechanisms. Conclusion: After a night of therapeutic SD, clinical responders show a significantly higher inducibility of associative LTP-like plasticity than non-responders.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available