4.1 Article

Measuring health-related quality of life in individuals with cyclodeviation using the Adult Strabismus 20 (AS-20) questionnaire

Journal

JOURNAL OF AAPOS
Volume 25, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

MOSBY-ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jaapos.2020.08.011

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Greta Andersson Foundation, Boras, Sweden

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study found that patients with cyclodeviation had significantly lower health-related quality of life scores compared to controls. Postoperative functional scores significantly improved, but psychosocial scores did not show significant improvement.
PURPOSE To assess health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in patients diagnosed with cyclodeviation and to evaluate subjective change following surgical treatment using the Adult Strabismus-20 (AS-20) questionnaire. METHODS A prospective cohort study was performed from 2014 to 2019 on 29 adult patients with cyclodeviation and cyclodiplopia who were due to undergo corrective strabismus surgery by the same surgeon. The group was divided into two subgroups, according to the type of surgery required for fusion. All scores were analyzed for the whole sample and subgroups. Preoperative scores were compared with those of control patients. RESULTS Pre- and postoperative QoL scores were successfully collected from 26 patients (mean age, 56 years; 8 female) using the AS-20 questionnaire. Scores were significantly higher for control subjects than for patients in the cyclodeviation group (P = 0.0001). Postoperative scores for all 20 questionnaire questions were significantly improved for all patients (P = 0.002). There was a significant improvement in the functional subscale score (P = 0.001), but not in the psychosocial subscale score (P = 0.23). Results were enhanced by Rasch analysis. CONCLUSIONS Cyclodeviation patients demonstrated significantly lower scores than controls. The functional scores were significantly lower than the psychosocial scores, in contrast to other forms of strabismus. Strabismus surgery had a significant effect on quality-of-life scores in this group of adults.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available