4.3 Article

Suprapubic-assisted laparoendoscopic single-site surgery versus standard laparoscopic nephrectomy: A propensity score-based analysis

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY
Volume 28, Issue 2, Pages 196-201

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/iju.14429

Keywords

laparoscopy; laparoendoscopic single‐ site surgery; nephrectomy; pubic hairline; umbilicus

Funding

  1. National High Technology Research and Development Program (863 Program) of China [SQ2011AAJY2801]
  2. Ganpo 555 Talents Program of Jiangxi Province
  3. Major Research and Development Project of Jiangxi Province [20202BBG73021]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Suprapubic-assisted laparoendoscopic single-site surgery nephrectomy and standard laparoscopic nephrectomy are generally equivalent in terms of safety and efficacy. However, the former offers reduced postoperative pain, shorter time before returning to work, and better overall cosmetic results compared to the latter.
Objectives To compare suprapubic-assisted laparoendoscopic single-site surgery nephrectomy with standard laparoscopic nephrectomy. Methods A retrospective case-control study comparing three surgeons' experience with 122 suprapubic-assisted laparoendoscopic single-site surgery nephrectomy and 107 standard laparoscopic nephrectomy was carried out. Operative time, estimated blood loss, intraoperative complications, intraoperative conversion, postoperative bowel recovery, postoperative analgesics, postoperative visual analog pain scale score, postoperative length of stay, days before going back to work, postoperative complications and Patient Scar Assessment Questionnaire were compared after propensity score matching. Results A total of 97 matched pairs were obtained after propensity score matching. There were no statistically significant differences between the suprapubic-assisted laparoendoscopic single-site surgery nephrectomy and standard laparoscopic nephrectomy groups with respect to operative time, estimated blood loss, intraoperative complications, intraoperative conversion, postoperative bowel recovery, length of stay and postoperative complications. Suprapubic-assisted laparoendoscopic single-site surgery nephrectomy group had decreased postoperative analgesics (20.9 vs 23.5, P = 0.04), visual analog pain scale score at 24 h (4.28 vs 5.28, P = 0.000), visual analog pain scale score at discharge (1.01 vs 1.47, P = 0.000), days before going back to work (28.4 vs 31.9, P = 0.000) and Patient Scar Assessment Questionnaire score (34.0 vs 42.0, P = 0.000), compared with the standard laparoscopic nephrectomy group. Conclusions Suprapubic-assisted laparoendoscopic single-site surgery nephrectomy and standard laparoscopic nephrectomy are equivalent in terms of the safety and efficacy. However, suprapubic-assisted laparoendoscopic single-site surgery nephrectomy confers less postoperative pain, fewer days before going back to work and better cosmetic result when compared with standard laparoscopic nephrectomy.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available