Journal
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THERMAL SCIENCES
Volume 159, Issue -, Pages -Publisher
ELSEVIER FRANCE-EDITIONS SCIENTIFIQUES MEDICALES ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijthermalsci.2020.106614
Keywords
Co-current flow; Computational fluid dynamics (CFD); Falling film thickness; Horizontal tube; Vapor flow; Volume of fluid (VOF)
Categories
Funding
- Hamad Bin Khalifa University
Ask authors/readers for more resources
The study focuses on analyzing the effects of co-current vapor flow on falling film distribution and hydrodynamics in a multi-effect evaporator. It found that vapor flow significantly affects the film distribution on the upper half of the tube, leading to a reduction in average film thickness and wetting time.
In the multi-effect evaporator (MED), the seawater falls on the outside of the tube, and the heat is transmitted from the steam flowing inside the tube. As a result, part of seawater evaporates and vapor is generated. Vapor flows in either co-current direction, cross direction or combination of both. The vapor flow exerts external force on falling film and affects film hydrodynamics, heat and mass transfer. This study focuses on analyzing the effects of co-current vapor flow on falling film distribution and hydrodynamics. A two-dimensional (2D) computational fluid dynamics model is developed and validated, in which sea water enters at 65 degrees C, which represents the maximum limit of current MED plant, and falls on a tube of 25.4 mm diameter from a 2 mm orifice. First, the liquid load is varied between 0.02 and 0.05 kg/(m.s), and its effects on the film thickness and the wetting time are calculated, presented and discussed. Afterwards, the impact of co-current vapor flow on film distribution, wetting time, minimum thickness and its location are quantified and examined by increasing the vapor velocity up to 6 m/s with 2 m/s intervals. It is found that the vapor flow significantly affects the film distribution on the upper half of the tube. The average film thickness and wetting time is reduced by 14.1% and 18.5%, respectively for the vapor velocity of 6 m/s compared to the no vapor flow, for 0.02 kg/(m.s). In addition, the minimum film thickness decreases by 23.1% for 0.02 kg/(m.s). The high decrement in film thickness can lead to dry patches and scale deposition in case of evaporation.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available