4.2 Article

The representation of public values in health technology assessment to inform funding decisions: the case of Australia's national funding bodies

Related references

Note: Only part of the references are listed.
Editorial Material Health Care Sciences & Services

The 'Top 10' Challenges for Health Technology Assessment: INAHTA Viewpoint

Brian O'Rourke et al.

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT IN HEALTH CARE (2020)

Article Health Care Sciences & Services

Defining the role of the public in Health Technology Assessment (HTA) and HTA-informed decision-making processes

Jackie Street et al.

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT IN HEALTH CARE (2020)

Article Ethics

Utilitarianism and the ethical foundations of cost-effectiveness analysis in resource allocation for global health

Elliot Marseille et al.

PHILOSOPHY ETHICS AND HUMANITIES IN MEDICINE (2019)

Article Health Care Sciences & Services

Are the benefits of new health services greater than their opportunity costs?

Laura Edney et al.

AUSTRALIAN HEALTH REVIEW (2019)

Article Health Care Sciences & Services

Community views and perspectives on public engagement in health technology assessment decision making

Sally Wortley et al.

AUSTRALIAN HEALTH REVIEW (2017)

Review Public, Environmental & Occupational Health

Attributes and weights in health care priority setting: A systematic review of what counts and to what extent

Yuanyuan Gu et al.

SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE (2015)

Review Health Care Sciences & Services

Role of patient and public participation in health technology assessment and coverage decisions

Devidas Menon et al.

EXPERT REVIEW OF PHARMACOECONOMICS & OUTCOMES RESEARCH (2011)

Article Health Care Sciences & Services

The history of health technology assessment in Australia

David Hailey

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT IN HEALTH CARE (2009)

Article Health Care Sciences & Services

Citizen deliberation in setting health-care priorities

NJ Murphy

HEALTH EXPECTATIONS (2005)