4.7 Article

Large-scale asymmetric pulverisation of fault zone: Insights from rock axial strain in static and dynamic loading conditions

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrmms.2020.104557

Keywords

Fault zone; Asymmetric pulverisation; Rock stiffness; Axial strain; Cyclic dynamic load

Funding

  1. China Scholarship Council-Monash University (CSC-Monash) Project [201606420068]
  2. Monash University Postgraduate Publications Award
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41525009, 41831281]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The experimental study reveals that the transition of rock fracture from local splitting to pervasive pulverisation is strain-controlled, leading to asymmetric damage in fault zones. As strain increases, different fracture patterns develop, ultimately broadening the scale of pulverisation due to cumulative damage. The linear correlation between energy absorption and strain allows for a good prediction of experimental data on the relationship between strain and loading cycles.
The open question of asymmetric large-scale pulverisation of fault zone was experimentally investigated in this paper. It is found that the transition of rock fracture from local splitting to pervasive pulverisation is controlled by strain both in quasi-static and dynamic conditions. This can explain the asymmetric damage in the fault zone as the strain threshold to pulverisation for stiffer rock is lower. In terms of the cyclic dynamic loadings, four types of fracture patterns (lateral tension, axial split, spatial fragmentation, and pervasive pulverisation) were developed with the increase of strain. Subject to the long-term quasi-static and dynamic load, the cumulative damage to the fault zone broadens the scale of pulverisation. In light of the linear correlation of energy absorption to strain, the damage relationships between strain and loading cycles were established and found to offer a good prediction of experimental data.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available