4.5 Article

An efficient and robust method for predicting asphalt concrete dynamic modulus

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PAVEMENT ENGINEERING
Volume 23, Issue 8, Pages 2565-2576

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/10298436.2020.1865533

Keywords

Gradient decision tree boosting; HMA; dynamic modulus; machine learning; computation efficiency

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [52008311, 51878499]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study developed gradient decision tree boosting models to estimate dynamic moduli of hot mix asphalt mixtures using data from the NCHRP report, achieving higher predictive accuracy compared to Witczak's models and comparable to neural networks in terms of complexity.
This study developed gradient decision tree boosting (GDTB) models to estimate dynamic moduli (vertical bar E*vertical bar) of hot mix asphalt (HMA) mixtures. The GDTB used as input the binder properties, mixture volumetric, and aggregate gradation of the mixtures. The data used for training the GDTB were extracted from a report of the National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP) project 9-19 [Witczak, M., 2006. Simple performance tests: summary of recommended methods and database. Washington, D.C.: Transportation Research Board, No. 547 in NCHRP Report.]. Totally, 7400 records of data for 346 mixtures were involved, among which 6700 were randomly chosen for training, 200 for validation, and 500 for testing. Comparative analyses were conducted among the GDTB, the two Witczak's equations, and two neural networks (NNs). This study emphasized both the predictive accuracy and computation efficiency of the models. The results indicated that the GDTB achieved predictive accuracy that was significantly higher than the Witczak's models and was in parallel to the more complex NNs. Compared to the Witczak's equations, for the viscosity-based model, the GDTB increased the coefficients of determination (R-2) by 51.5% (arithmetic) and 11.5% (logarithmic), respectively; for the vertical bar G*vertical bar based model, it respectively increased the R-2 by 22.5% (arithmetic) and 8% (logarithmic). Besides the enhanced predictive accuracy, the GDTB only marginally increased the computing time comparing with the empirical equations.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available