4.3 Review

Augmented reality in craniomaxillofacial surgery: added value and proposed recommendations through a systematic review of the literature

Journal

Publisher

CHURCHILL LIVINGSTONE
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijom.2020.11.015

Keywords

augmented reality; mixed reality; data visualization; computer graphics; maxillo-facial surgery; minimally invasive surgical procedures; computer-assisted surgery

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This systematic review examines the benefits of using AR technology in craniomaxillofacial surgery, finding that AR can offer various advantages, but facing challenges such as difficulty in aggregating reported metrics, lack of statistical value from current studies, and insufficient user evaluation studies.
This systematic review provides an overview of augmented reality (AR) and its benefits in craniomaxillofacial surgery in an attempt to answer the question: Is AR beneficial for craniomaxillofacial surgery? This review includes a description of the studies conducted, the systems used and their technical characteristics. The search was performed in four databases: PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, and Web of Science. All journal articles published during the past 11 years related to AR, mixed reality, craniomaxillofacial, and surgery were considered in this study. From a total of 7067 articles identified using AR-and surgery-related keywords, 39 articles were finally selected. Based on these articles, a classification of study types, surgery types, devices used, metrics reported, and benefits were collected. The findings of this review indicate that AR could provide various benefits, addressing the challenges of conventional navigation systems, such as hand-eye coordination and depth perception. However, three main concerns were raised while performing this study: (1) it is complicated to aggregate the metrics reported in the articles, (2) it is difficult to obtain statistical value from the current studies, and (3) user evaluation studies are lacking. This article concludes with recommendations for future studies by addressing the latter points.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available