4.7 Review

A Closer Look at Estrogen Receptor Mutations in Breast Cancer and Their Implications for Estrogen and Antiestrogen Responses

Journal

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ijms22020756

Keywords

estrogen receptor; breast cancer; endocrine resistance; mutation; receptor folding

Funding

  1. MENRT scholarships from the French Minister of High Education, Research and Innovation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Breast cancer is the most common cancer among women worldwide. While most ER-positive breast cancer cases initially respond to antiestrogen therapies, a high percentage develop resistance over time. Research on mutated forms of ER alpha has led to potential developments in new antiestrogen treatments.
Breast cancer (BC) is the most common cancer among women worldwide. More than 70% of BC cases express estrogen receptor alpha (ER alpha), a central transcription factor that stimulates the proliferation of breast cancer cells, usually in the presence of estrogen. While most cases of ER-positive BC initially respond to antiestrogen therapies, a high percentage of cases develop resistance to treatment over time. The recent discovery of mutated forms of ER alpha that result in constitutively active forms of the receptor in the metastatic-resistance stage of BC has provided a strong rationale for the development of new antiestrogens. These molecules targeting clinically relevant ER alpha mutants and a combination with other pharmacological inhibitors of specific pathways may constitute alternative treatments to improve clinical practice in the fight against metastatic-resistant ER-positive BC. In this review, we summarize the latest advances regarding the particular involvement of point mutations of ER alpha in endocrine resistance. We also discuss the involvement of synonymous ER alpha mutations with respect to co-translational folding of the receptor and ribosome biogenesis in breast carcinogenesis.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available