4.7 Article

Extracellular Vesicles from Follicular and Ampullary Fluid Isolated by Density Gradient Ultracentrifugation Improve Bovine Embryo Development and Quality

Journal

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ijms22020578

Keywords

extracellular vesicles; follicular fluid; ampullary oviductal fluid

Funding

  1. Ghent University [BOF GOA 2018000504 (GOA030-18 BOF)]
  2. Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek [12Y5220N, 1228821N]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study compared two methods for isolating EVs from bovine follicular fluid and ampullary oviduct fluid, and found that EVs isolated using OptiPrep density gradient ultracentrifugation showed benefits for embryo development and quality.
Extracellular vesicles (EVs) have been isolated from follicular (FF) and ampullary oviduct fluid (AOF), using different isolation methods. However, it is not clear whether different purification methods can affect the functionality of resulting EVs. Here, we compared two methods (OptiPrep (TM) density gradient ultracentrifugation (ODG UC) and single-step size exclusion chromatography (SEC) (qEV IZON (TM) single column)) for the isolation of EVs from bovine FF and AOF. Additionally, we evaluated whether the addition of EVs derived either by ODG UC or SEC from FF or AOF during oocyte maturation would yield extra benefits for embryo developmental competence. The characterization of EVs isolated using ODG UC or SEC from FF and AOF did not show any differences in terms of EV sizes (40-400 nm) and concentrations (2.4 +/- 0.2 x 10(12)-1.8 +/- 0.2 x 10(13) particles/mL). Blastocyst yield and quality was higher in groups supplemented with EVs isolated from FF and AOF by ODG UC, with higher total cell numbers and a lower apoptotic cell ratio compared with the other groups (p < 0.05). Supplementing in vitro maturation media with EVs derived by ODG UC from AOF was beneficial for bovine embryo development and quality.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available