4.5 Article

Identifying hyperinsulinaemia in the absence of impaired glucose tolerance: An examination of the Kraft database

Journal

DIABETES RESEARCH AND CLINICAL PRACTICE
Volume 118, Issue -, Pages 50-57

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.diabres.2016.06.007

Keywords

Hyperinsulinaemia; Insulin; Diabetes; Oral glucose tolerance test

Funding

  1. Heart Foundation (NZ) [1522]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: Hyperinsulinaemia is associated with development of chronicmetabolic disease and is emerging as a health risk independent to that of insulin resistance. However, little is known to what extent hyperinsulinaemia occurs with normal glucose tolerance in lean subjects. Method: Oral glucose tolerance tests with concurrent insulin assay were conducted during the 1970s-1990s. Participants were classified according to glucose tolerance and insulin response pattern. Analysis of variance compared differences in plasma glucose, plasma insulin, and demographic and metabolic risk factors between groups. Results: Participants with normal glucose tolerance comprised 54% (n = 4185) of the total cohort. Of these, just over half (n = 2079) showed hyperinsulinaemia despite normal glucose clearance. Obesity had a modest association with hyperinsulinaemia in people with normal glucose tolerance. Fasting insulin had limited value in diagnosing hyperinsulinaemia. The majority of participants (93%) with impaired glucose tolerance or diabetes had concurrent hyperinsulinaemia. Conclusion: Hyperinsulinaemia in the absence of impaired glucose tolerance may provide the earliest detection for metabolic disease risk and likely occurs in a substantial proportion of an otherwise healthy population. Dynamic insulin patterning may produce more meaningful and potentially helpful diagnoses. Further research is needed to investigate clinically useful hyperinsulinaemia screening tools. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available