4.5 Article

Master manipulator optimisation for robot assisted minimally invasive surgery

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/rcs.2208

Keywords

dexterity; ergonomics; master manipulator; robot-assisted minimally invasive surgery; structural optimisation

Categories

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51975241]
  2. science and technology department of Jilin province [20180101076JC]
  3. Key R&D Project of Jilin Province Science and Technology Department [20200404150YY]
  4. Jilin province industrial technology research and development project [2019C048-3]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A structure optimization method for the master manipulator was proposed, which ensured a large workspace and good kinematic performance through optimization index and reasonable weight coefficients. This improved the comfort of the surgeon and effectively avoided communication interruption issues due to a small workspace.
Background; In robot-assisted minimally invasive surgery, the surgeon controls a robot by operating a pair of master manipulators. Thus, the performance of a master manipulator directly affects the work of the surgeon physiologically and psychologically. Aims: In order to improve the operability and quality of operation, a structure optimisation method of master manipulator is proposed. Materials & Methods: The optimisation index of workspace and dexterity of main manipulator based on ergonomics and kinematics is established, and the reasonable weight coefficient of optimisation index is determined by using combination weighting method. Results: Experiments verified that the proposed optimisation method ensures a large workspace and good kinematic performance for the master manipulator. Conclusion: This improves the comfort of the surgeon and can effectively avoid the problem of cutting off master-slave communication to adjust the position of the master manipulator owing to the small workspace.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available