4.6 Article

Seasonality of drinking water sources and the impact of drinking water source on enteric infections among children in Limpopo, South Africa

Publisher

ELSEVIER GMBH
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijheh.2020.113640

Keywords

Seasonality; Water quality; Pathogen; Enteric infection; Water source; Access

Funding

  1. Thrasher Research Fund [13923]
  2. U.S. National Academies of Sciences
  3. USAID [AID-OAA-A-11-00012]
  4. National Research Foundation of South Africa [114725]
  5. National Science Foundation [CBET-1438619]
  6. National Institutes of Health, Fogarty International Center [D43TW009359]
  7. National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases [K01AI130326]
  8. University of Virginia (UVA) Jefferson Public Citizens Program
  9. Center for Global Health, University of Virginia, United States
  10. National Institutes of Health, National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities [T37MD008659]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigated the seasonal shifts in primary drinking water source type and their effect on enteric infections in young children in rural South Africa. The majority of households switched to municipal water during the dry season, and there were no significant differences in enteric pathogen prevalence between different drinking water sources.
Enteric infections and water-related illnesses are more frequent during times of relative water abundance, especially in regions that experience bimodal rainfall patterns. However, it is unclear how seasonal changes in water availability and drinking water source types affect enteric infections in young children. This study investigated seasonal shifts in primary drinking water source type and the effect of water source type on enteric pathogen prevalence in stool samples from 404 children below age 5 in rural communities in Limpopo Province, South Africa. From wet to dry season, 4.6% (n = 16) of households switched from a source with a higher risk of contamination to a source with lower risk, with the majority switching to municipal water during the dry season. In contrast, 2.6% (n = 9) of households switched from a source with a lower risk of contamination to a source with higher risk. 74.5% (n = 301) of the total households experienced interruptions in their water supply, regardless of source type. There were no significant differences in enteric pathogen prevalence between drinking water sources. Intermittent municipal water distribution and household water use and storage practices may have a larger impact on enteric infections than water source type. The limited differences in enteric pathogen prevalence in children by water source could also be due to other exposure pathways in addition to drinking water, for example through direct contact and food-borne transmission.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available