4.7 Article

Optimization of pressure swing adsorption for hydrogen purification based on Box-Behnken design method

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY
Volume 46, Issue 7, Pages 5403-5417

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.11.045

Keywords

Hydrogen purification; Pressure swing adsorption; Box-behnken design; Quadratic regression; Simulation; Optimization

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51476120]
  2. State Administration of Foreign Experts Affairs of China for the 111 Project [B17034]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of Liaoning Province [2020-CSLH-43]
  4. China Scholarship Council (CSC)
  5. Fonds de Recherche du Quebec - Nature et Technologies (FRQNT) [279245]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Pressure swing adsorption (PSA) is an important technology for gas separation and purification. A dynamic model for a layered adsorption bed packed with activated carbon and zeolite 5A was developed and validated, with optimization parameters of adsorption time, pressure equalization time, and P/F ratio studied using the Box-Behnken design method. The study showed that as adsorption time increased, purity decreased while recovery and productivity increased, highlighting the need for parameter optimization in PSA processes.
Pressure swing adsorption (PSA) is an important technology for mixture gas separation and purification. In this work, a dynamic model for a layered adsorption bed packed with activated carbon and zeolite 5A was developed and validated to study the PSA process. The model was validated by calculating breakthrough curves of a five-component gas mixture (H-2/CH4/CO/N-2/CO2 = 56.4/26./8.4/5.5/3.1 mol%) and comparing the results with available experimental data. The purification performance of six-step layered bed PSA cycle was studied using the model. In order to optimize the cycle, the Box-Behnken design (BBD) method was used, as implemented in Design Expert (TM). The parametric study showed that, for adsorption step durations ranging from 160 to 200 s, as the adsorption time increased, the purity decreased, whereas the recovery and productivity increased. During the pressure equalization step, the purity increased as the pressure equalization time increased, but the recovery and productivity decreased for step durations ranging from 10 to 30 s. As the P/F ratio (hydrogen used in purge step to hydrogen fed in adsorption step) increased from 0.05 to 0.125, the purity increased, whereas the recovery and productivity decreased. The optimization of the layered bed PSA process by the BBD method was then performed. In addition to the adsorption time, the pressure equalization time and the P/F ratio were considered as independent optimization parameters. Quadratic regression equations were then obtained for three responses of the system, namely purity, recovery, and productivity. When purity is set as the main performance indicator, the following values were obtained for the optimization parameters: an adsorption time of 168 s, a pressure equalization time of 14 s, and a P/F ratio of 0.11. Under those conditions, the system achieved a purity of 99.99%, a recovery of 57.76%, and a productivity of 6.41 mol/(kg.h). (C) 2020 Hydrogen Energy Publications LLC. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available