4.6 Article

Effect of Imperfect Information and Action Automation on Attentional Allocation

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HUMAN-COMPUTER INTERACTION
Volume 37, Issue 11, Pages 1063-1073

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/10447318.2020.1870817

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Agence Nationale de la Recherche (Smart Planning) [ANR-16-CE26-0017]
  2. Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR) [ANR-16-CE26-0017] Funding Source: Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Previous research has shown that information and action automation stages have different effects on human performance supervision automated systems. In a multitasking environment, the reliability of information automation influences visual resource allocation, while the reliability of action automation does not affect performance or cumulative dwell times.
Previous research has suggested that information and action automation stages do not imply the same consequences for human performance in the supervision of automated systems. Still, only a few studies have simultaneously investigated these stages. When information and action automation are reliable, both can support performance. However, with unreliable aids, the literature has suggested that action automation tends to be more detrimental than information automation. This study aimed to assess the contributions of imperfect information and action automation on attentional allocation and to investigate a potential monitoring inefficiency in a multitasking environment. Participants (n = 96) completed three Multi-Attribute Task Battery (MATB) tasks. A monitoring task was automated with two types of automation (action or information) of four reliabilities each (0%; 56.25%; 87.5%; 100%). Ocular behaviors and performance were assessed. Results show that reliability of information automation influenced visual resource allocation. When information automation was the most reliable, participants spent the least amount of time sampling the monitoring task. Finally, the reliability of action automation triggered no effect on performance or cumulative dwell times. Our results suggest that in complex multitasking situations where information and action automation occurred simultaneously, participants allocated fewer visual resources to automated task with increased information automation reliability. Similarly, their performance was better only with increased information automation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available