4.1 Review

Ethnic differences in thromboprophylaxis for COVID-19 patients: should they be considered?

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEMATOLOGY
Volume 113, Issue 3, Pages 330-336

Publisher

SPRINGER JAPAN KK
DOI: 10.1007/s12185-021-03078-x

Keywords

COVID-19; Thromboembolism; Deep vein thrombus; Thromboprophylaxis; Ethnic difference

Categories

Funding

  1. Promotion and Mutual Aid Corporation for Private Schools of Japan

Ask authors/readers for more resources

There may be differences in thrombosis and bleeding among different ethnicities in COVID-19 patients, with a lower incidence of thromboembolic events in the Asian population. Despite bleeding being a side effect, current evidence supports routine anticoagulant use and thromboprophylaxis using a standard dose of LMWH for admitted patients.
Thromboembolic events contribute to morbidity and mortality in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). As a result, thromboprophylaxis using low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) is universally recommended for hospitalized patients based on multiple guidelines. However, ethnic differences with respect to thrombogenicity have been reported and the incidence of thromboembolic events is considered to be lower in the Asian population. Despite the importance of thromboprophylaxis, bleeding is also a side effect that should be considered. We examine the data relating to potential ethnic differences in thrombosis and bleeding in COVID-19. Although sufficient data is not yet available, current evidence does not oppose routine anticoagulant use and thromboprophylaxis using a standard dose of LMWH for admitted patients regardless of ethnicity based on our review.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available